I' m not sure where this idea comes from that if the Undying interpretation doesn't equate to Jon, that so mehow means Dany/Jon will never, never happe n. Once, with his newborn son, where he talks about the Prince that was promised, whose is the song of ice and fire (ice=Stark + fire= Targaryen), and then she sees him dying, uttering a woman's name (Lyanna). I don't think I'm reaching out saying that the blue flower growing in a wall of ice is Jon, since the flower is strictly associated with his mother and the Wall is the location where he is at.īut that is not the only vision in the HOTU that relates to Jon. The parallels between Rhaegar/Lyanna and Bael/Stark maiden are obvious. Finally, blue roses are central to the story of Bael the Bard, who "kidnapped" a Stark maiden leaving only a blue rose in her bed. A crown of the same flowers is given to Lyanna by Rhaegar when he proclaims her queen of love and beauty at the Tourney at Harrenhal. We know from Ned's memories that she loved blue winter roses. But unless you can back that up with some sort of reasoning, you can't expect others to bu y in on that .īlue flowers are mentioned a few times throughout the novels, always associated with certain characters: in primis, Lyanna Stark. If you have "absolutely no doubt", that's fine. You never said that literally, but it's the only conclusion you've left me in a plain 2 + 2 sort of way. If I had to guess, Jon/Dany will happen in some way, but I don't see this as evidence. Ygitte/Jon and Jaime/Brienne weren't foreshadowed until they were in each other's arcs already that I've seen, so this not being Jon/Dany foreshadowing doesn't mean it won't happen. As was stated upthread, the fandom adheres to this interpretation despite it not making sense, despite arbitrarily throwing out Hizzy, despite how GRRM soooo often uses the word "sweet" for things which deceive, are poisoned, or just death, and it almost always centers around using it Jon/Dany foreshadowing which you've brought up repeatedly. You cut out the part of my post where I explain why it makes no sense and haven't bothered to address these. But unless you can back that up with some sort of reasoning, you can't expect others to buy in on that. You never said that literally, but it's the only conclusion you've left me in a plain 2 + 2 sort of way. It would make more sense if the one in the middle were Hizdahr, but it doesn't look plausible. While the first refers to Drogo and the last to Jon, the one in the middle is confusing. I have absolutely no doubt that the blue flower growing in a wall of ice is Jon.Īs regards the interpretation of "bride of fire" I'm still a bit confused. Hmmmm, I never said that, I'm not sure what you mean here.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |